Home / World / Trump’s explain joining New York bombing to an ‘extremely open immigration system’

Trump’s explain joining New York bombing to an ‘extremely open immigration system’

“These attacks and many others were done probable given of a intensely open immigration system, that fails to scrupulously oldster and shade a people or families entrance into a country.”
— Donald Trump, debate convene speech, Sept. 19, 2016

Fox News horde Ainsley Earhardt: “Why do they caring so most if we use a word ‘bombing’ or not? we mean, we’re articulate about a belligerent conflict and there are bigger issues here. Why is that?” […]

Trump: “Well, that’s not unequivocally a reason. The reason is given my check numbers now are so good that they are so worried. … we mean, it’s common sense, nonetheless they will do anything. Think of it, Hillary Clinton wants to concede hundreds of thousands of these same people that are, we know, they have such loathing and illness in their heart. It’s sickness, and it’s hatred, and she wants to concede hundreds of thousands some-more to come in.”
— Exchange on Fox and Friends, Sept. 19, 2016

In response to Saturday’s bombings in Manhattan and Seaside Park, N.J., Trump touted his devise to branch immigration, with a concentration on Muslims, and criticized Hillary Clinton’s offer to accept Syrian refugees.

On Monday, New York Police Department identified Ahmad Khan Rahami in tie to a bombings. Rahami was apprehended on Monday after an apparent shootout with police.

Trump blamed a bombings on a “extremely open immigration system” in a United States, and criticized Clinton’s offer to accept during slightest 65,000 some-more refugees from war-torn Syria. (In a Fox interview, Trump wrongly says Clinton wants to acknowledge “hundreds of thousands” of Syrian refugees.) But what does a interloper resettlement routine have to do with Rahami?

The Facts

There’s always a probability of false or deficient reports in a liquid violation news situation, such as these bombings. So we will go by what law coercion has released, which Trump should be going by as well, unless he somehow has approach believe of Rahami and his immigration background.

Here’s what we know so far.

Rahami, 28, was innate in Afghanistan, came to a United States with his family when he was immature and was naturalized, according to a FBI. He lived in New Jersey with his family, above a family’s restaurant, First American Chicken in Elizabeth, N.J. Members of a Rahami family have owned and operated a grill given 2002, according to The Washington Post’s review of justice records.

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), member of a House Homeland Security Committee, told The Post that Rahami’s “trips to Afghanistan altered him,” adding that a 28-year-old had also visited Pakistan during some point. Neighbors told a New York Times that Rahami showed signs of radicalization after he visited Afghanistan. But as of Monday night, law coercion had not nonetheless reliable either Rahami was shabby by ubiquitous apprehension organizations, or had any links to them.

“I do not have information nonetheless to uncover what a trail of radicalization was,” pronounced William Sweeney, FBI special representative in New York, during a news discussion on Monday afternoon. Law coercion pronounced there was no denote Rahami was a partial of a incomparable network.

As of Monday night, NBC News and a Daily Beast cited unknown U.S. officials to contend that Rahami arrived in a U.S. in 1995 as a son of an Afghan haven seeker. But no law coercion organisation had reliable this detail. The Department of Homeland Security did not yield any information to The Fact Checker about Rahami’s immigration history.

Such information is not always accurate. For example, a Tsarnaev brothers in a Boston Marathon bombings were identified as refugees in initial news reports. But later, it was revealed that a brothers finished adult in a United States as minors given their father practical for asylum.

Also on Saturday, 22-year-old Dahir Adan was fatally shot by an off-duty military officer after stabbing 9 people in a Minnesota mall. A news organisation related to the Islamic State claimed he was a “soldier” of a belligerent group, nonetheless law coercion found no justification of approach or surreptitious communications and pronounced Adan seemed to be a sole attacker. Adan changed to a United States from Kenya during age 2 and grew adult in Minnesota.

The problem with Trump joining a bombings to an “extremely open immigration system” or Clinton’s devise to acknowledge Syrian refugees is that we don’t know all a sum of Rahami’s immigration story yet. Trump misleads a open by observant that Syrian refugees accessible to benefit entrance into a United States are people who have “such loathing and illness in their heart,” and by comparing them to Rahami. (The Trump debate did not respond to a ask for clarification.)

Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump. (AP/ Evan Vucci)

Even if a family’s asylee standing were confirmed, there is a disproportion between refugees and asylees. Refugees are screened outward of a United States, and are referred for resettlement generally by a United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Asylum-seekers request for haven once they are in a United States or during a border. Asylum standing is accessible to people who meet a definition of a refugee; successful asylum-seekers obtain interloper status, nonetheless a screening custom is different.

Resettled refugees have not been a vital belligerent hazard to a U.S. homeland (we took a deep-dive into this emanate final year). On occasion, refugees have acted terrorism threats, and have been related to ubiquitous belligerent groups: There have been during slightest 10 occasions given 2009 when refugees were arrested on terrorism-related charges in a United States, nonetheless that’s a small commission of a refugees certified in that period.

By contrast, homegrown terrorism, generally among sole enemy who are not a partial of a incomparable network, is a flourishing concern, generally American adults who are radicalized online.

The Pinocchio Test

Based on a information we have so far, a consider in a bombings was an American who became radicalized. He came to a U.S. during a immature age with his family, and became a naturalized U.S. citizen. It’s unconfirmed nonetheless how Rahami entered a United States — either he gained interloper status, asylum-seeker status, or perceived some form of visa. This points to radicalization of those vital legally in a U.S., that is a opposite matter than what Trump talked about in response to a bombings on Monday.

Instead, Trump blamed a bombings on a “extremely open immigration system” and to a “hatred and sickness” of refugees (including from Syria). But this is utterly misleading. Rahami’s intensity for radicalization while legally vital in a U.S. and legally roving to his home nation is not something that would be held by a vetting complement on entry. Only a diminutive series of refugees are ever related to terrorism. Moreover, Trump exaggerates a series of Syrian refugees Clinton has pronounced she would accept.

In Trump’s view, refugees (Syrian or otherwise), homegrown terrorism, asylum-seekers and naturalized adults of Afghan skirmish might all fit into one bucket. But that’s not how it works, and it’s overly dubious to make such unconditional claims with such little, convincing information during hand.

Three Pinocchios


(About a rating scale)


Send us contribution to check by stuffing out this form


Sign adult for The Fact Checker weekly newsletter

How would we rate this claim? (The check symbol means we consider a matter is true, not that we determine with a rating.)

Pardon a interruption!

We need to determine that we are an tangible person.

This is a non-scientific user poll. Results are not statistically current and can't be insincere to simulate a views of Washington Post users as a organisation or a ubiquitous population.


About admin