AP Photo/Steve Nesius, Pool
Today, a jury awarded former pro wrestler Hulk Hogan (real name Terry Bollea) a whopping $115 million in his authorised box opposite Gawker Media, however, as we know by now, that doesn’t meant Hogan is collecting $115 milly.
Hogan, who sued a media association for $100 million behind in 2012 accusing a website of advance of remoteness and other torts for posting 101 seconds of a sex fasten featuring a wrestling idol and his ex Heather Clem, was awarded $55 million for mercantile injuries and $60 million for romantic distress, according to CNN.
And there’s a probability for some some-more income on tip of that, as a jury will reassemble subsequent week to cruise punitive indemnification on tip of a $115 million already awarded.
But profession Troy Slaten, who is not connected with this box in any way, tells E! News that after all is pronounced and done, Hogan will substantially get reduction than half of a judgment.
Here’s how it all breaks down…
MORE: Hulk Hogan Awarded $115 Million in Sex Tape Lawsuit Against Gawker
“Let’s contend he gets $115 million dollars and that stood. The attorneys get 40 percent off a tip and afterwards he also has to compensate out a cost of a litigation, that means not a attorneys’ hourly fees, though all a cost of a investigators, experts, witnesses. So we can assume in a box this vast that a cost of a attorneys is going to be $1 million, and their paralegals and investigate and travel and all a cost that will go along with it,” Slaten explains.
“And afterwards there’s taxes. The IRS treats personal damage awards like this differently depending on a impression of a claim. If we are being compensated for a earthy damage like damaged bones, we can’t eat, nausea, earthy injuries—those are not taxable. If it’s for mislaid salary then, yes, it’s taxable as if that income was wages.
“If it’s quite an romantic damage that does not have a earthy member to it, afterwards that is taxable—the supervision gets like half of that apportionment that is quite emotional. Just like Erin Andrews, Hulk will have taxation attorneys operative tough on this and they will make a evidence to a IRS that he suffered earthy manifestations of a romantic injury—that he couldn’t sleep, he is carrying nightmares, he is pang PTSD, erectile dysfunction, he can’t have suitable relationships, sweats, all a things he could presumably have.”
RELATED: Here’s how many of Erin Andrews’ $55 million visualisation she’ll indeed get
So with all that said, we’re looking during roughly $46 million in profession fees, another $2 million in lawsuit fees, and presumption a residue $67 million is taxable (which means half is removing cut), Hogan is left with—drum roll, please—$30-40 million. And yes, that is still a cube of change, though really not $115 million.
Then again, there are a punitive damages, that Slaten couldn’t even start to round park. “It could be anything. God knows what it will be. we couldn’t even start to assume on that. Frankly I’m repelled during a $115 million dollar saving outcome for display a video for 9 seconds.”
However, there’s a vast possibility Gawker is going to appeal, that afterwards throws another financial bend round into a mix.
“This is a really vast outcome and it’s going to have to be appealed,” Slaten tells us. “In this case, Gawker is going to interest since Hulk doesn’t wish to interest it, he’s anxious he got some-more than he was seeking for—so, Gawker is going to interest and they will have to put adult a bond for $50 million, in box they remove and that income is there for Bollea.”
He continues, “That is one of a many formidable things in a lawsuit. You can win a judgment, though that doesn’t meant a income only automatically flows into your bank account…He will not see a income for a while—even years.”
MORE: Erin Andrews Feels during Peace With $55 Million Verdict in Peeping Tom Lawsuit
Additionally, “an Appeals justice could simply confirm a jury was wrong and cut a endowment in half. If they felt that no reasonable juror should have ruled that way. Cases get overturned on interest all a time,” Slaten tells us, explaining that they could finish adult only settling for a $50 million instead.
“And if Hulk and a attorneys are OK with that, a attorneys are walking divided with $20 million-plus and Hulk gets $30 million, afterwards maybe they would do it. we don’t know. It would count on what a attorneys consider is how viable a explain on interest is.”
Regardless, a vast visualisation lifted a lot of eyebrows today, generally entrance after a $55 million awarded to Andrews in her Peeping Tom box opposite a Marriott hotel in Nashville. And it really sparked some engaging conversations on a Internet:
So, here are a criticism sections after Hulk Hogan perceived his verdict, compared to when Erin Andrews did. pic.twitter.com/NNDAvxQIAO
— Travis Johns (@T_BJohns) March 18, 2016
Slaten tells E! News that a categorical disproportion (aside from a tangible case) between a dual judgments is who they were targeting. “It’s opposite in a Erin Andrews box in that there’s only one defendant, and a suspect is a vast association that theoretically has low pockets. Meaning Lots of money.”
“In a Erin Andrews case, a visualisation was separate between Marriott and a peeping tom. The peeping tom had no flow, no dough. He had no income and so we can’t get blood from a turnip. But in this case, Gawker is a vital edition opening and they theoretically have resources and even word to cover lawsuits.”
All in all, Slaten believes Hogan and Gawker should try to strech a settlement. “I consider that is what they should do and that is what customarily happens. You never know, we never know what another justice can do. The judges that are looking during this competence consider that’s absurd like many lawyers, each singular counsel that I’ve talked to thinks this endowment is outrageous.”
PHOTOS: Court Appearances