Home / Science / NASA Hasn’t Changed Your Zodiac Sign and This New Sign Isn’t New At All | The Weather Channel
ABVE ARTICLE BANNER ADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

NASA Hasn’t Changed Your Zodiac Sign and This New Sign Isn’t New At All | The Weather Channel

Story Highlights

The proclamation of a 13th zodiac sign, Ophiuchus, caused a stir on amicable media.

NASA says it has not altered a zodiac signs, though has simply distributed a math of a Babylonians.

This month, NASA threw many people’s slight of checking their horoscope for a loop when it came out that there was a 13th zodiac sign. However, it turns out that a small difficulty spiraled into a unhappy mess.

According to Quartz, a anger began when a author for Cosmopolitan U.K. reported on an essay found on one of NASA’s children’s websites. In a article, it states that a zodiac signs were done to fit a calendar year of a Babylonians.

The Babylonians lived over 3,000 years ago,” wrote NASA. “They divided a zodiac into 12 equal tools — like slicing a pizza into 12 equal slices. They picked 12 constellations in a zodiac, one for any of a 12 ‘slices.’ So, as Earth orbits a Sun, a Sun would appear to pass by any of a 12 tools of a zodiac. Since a Babylonians already had a 12-month calendar (based on a phases of a Moon), any month got a cut of a zodiac all to itself.

“But even according to a Babylonians’ possess ancient stories, there were 13 constellations in a zodiac. So a Babylonians picked one, Ophiuchus, to leave out. Even then, some of a selected 12 didn’t fit orderly into their reserved cut of a cake and slopped over into a subsequent one.”

(MORE: Black Moon 2016: What It Is and Why You Can’t See It)

Ophiuchus, Latin for “serpent bearer,” was first available in a 2nd century by Greek astronomer Ptolemy, Space.com reports. In terms of a zodiac, it’s meant to paint people innate between Nov. 30 and Dec. 17. The constellation contains Barnard’s star, a second closest star to Earth.

This information caused a flattering large stir online as people questioned a charts, readings and ask formula formed around their zodiac sign. However, NASA has given come brazen and privileged a air.

“Here during NASA, we investigate astronomy, not astrology,” a group wrote on a Tumblr account. “We didn’t change any zodiac signs, we only did a math.”

The constellations are opposite shapes and sizes, that means a object will spend varying amounts of time lined adult with any one, NASA explains. Since a Babylonians initial combined a 12 zodiac signs, a sky has shifted since a Earth’s pivot isn’t indicating in a same instruction it was 3 millennia ago.

Even with this “breaking” news about a 13th zodiac sign, it still doesn’t change most when it comes to standard horoscope.

According to Astrostyle.com, Western astrology follows a opposite complement regulating “artificial” constellations. Instead of following a stars’ movements, Western astrology is formed on a Sun’s trail as seen from Earth. Astrologers have done immobile stones within that trail and use them to lane heavenly movements, permitting zodiac pointer dates to sojourn a same.

Additionally, NASA emphasized that astrology is something totally aside from science, since astronomy is a systematic investigate of all in outdoor space.

MORE ON WEATHER.COM: Photo Contest 2016 Starry Nights

BELW ARTICLE BANNER ADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

About admin