Home / Politics / A Short History of Lawmakers Trolling Anti-Abortion Politics

A Short History of Lawmakers Trolling Anti-Abortion Politics


Feb 16, 2016 4:11 pm

CREDIT: AP Photo, Sue Ogrocki

Oklahoma state Sen. Constance Johnson (D-Oklahoma City) speaks during a news discussion in Oklahoma City, Tuesday, May 8, 2012.

As an augmenting series of regressive lawmakers try to insert politics into women’s personal reproductive choices, some-more and some-more of their womanlike peers are fighting behind with satirical legislation.

The latest came final week, when a Kentucky lawmaker introduced a new check that would umpire entrance to erectile dysfunction drugs regulating restrictions identical to what many women now face when perplexing to get an termination in a state. Rep. Mary Lou Marzian (D) penned a check to stress a nonessential hoops women in her state (and others) have to burst by to make a private preference about their body. And she positively wasn’t a initial to do so. Over a past 5 years, magnanimous women lawmakers have crafted a accumulation of tongue-in-cheek bills to respond to their GOP counterparts’ anti-abortion legislation. None of a bills done it distant — though that wasn’t their intention. Here’s a few of a highlights:

Defining masturbation as an act assault opposite a unborn

Oklahoma State Sen. Constance Johnson (D) submitted an amendment to an Oklahoma Personhood check in 2012 in which: “Any movement in that a masculine ejaculates or differently deposits semen anywhere though in a woman’s vagina shall be interpreted and construed as an movement opposite an unborn child.” Johnson pronounced she tacked on this amendment to demonstrate her disappointment in a state’s seductiveness in policing women’s eggs while ignoring masculine impasse in conception.

Banning vasectomies

In response to a Georgia check that would inculpate women who had an termination 20 weeks into a pregnancy, State Rep. Yasmin Neal (D) filed a check in 2012 undisguised banning vasectomies regulating identical language.

“It is plainly astray that organisation equivocate a rewards of neglected fatherhood by supposed that their visualisation over such matters is some-more current than a visualisation of a General Assembly,” a check read. Neal stressed that her legislation was pristine satire, and pronounced that “even if it were due as a critical issue, it’s still not my place as a lady to tell a masculine what to do with his body.”

Imposing imperative watchful durations and sex therapy for Viagra users

Last year, South Carolina Rep. Mia McLeod (D) introduced a check identical to Kentucky’s Marzian, adding despotic regulation to men’s entrance to erectile dysfunction drugs. In her bill, organisation would have to obtain a “notarized confirmation in that during slightest one of a patient’s passionate partners affirms that a studious has gifted symptoms of erectile dysfunction,” be seen by a state-licensed passionate therapist, and cruise virginity as a improved “lifestyle choice.” Like Marzian, McLeod’s check mimics South Carolina’s possess formidable restrictions on abortion.

Making guns as formidable to obtain as an abortion

Instead of enormous down on men’s entrance to health care, Missouri State Rep. Stacey Newman (D) filed a check final year to make it only as difficult to buy a lethal arms in a state as it now is to get an abortion.

The check pushed a 72-hour watchful duration for impending gun customer — identical to a time a lady has to wait before returning to a doctor’s bureau to get an termination after her initial revisit — and criminialized people from shopping a gun some-more than 120 miles from their home. Additionally, buyers would be compulsory to accommodate with a medicine to plead a risks of gun tenure and accept information on gun alternatives, like “peaceful and pacifist dispute resolution.”

“If we truly insist that Missouri cares about ‘all life’, afterwards we contingency take evident stairs to residence a vital cities rising rates of gun violence,” Newman pronounced in a statement.

Requesting a eremite difference from ‘unscientific laws’

The Satanic Temple — a faith village that describes itself as facilitating “the communication and mobilization of politically wakeful Satanists, secularists, and advocates for particular liberty” — campaigned in 2014 for a eremite exemption from certain anti-abortion laws, given they didn’t rest on systematic accuracy. On a heels of a Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling, a organisation pronounced that like a anti-abortion company, their beliefs were disregarded by state-level laws — privately a “informed consent” laws that rest on dubious information about termination risks.

“Because of a honour a Court has given to eremite beliefs, and a fact that a a beliefs are formed on best accessible knowledge, we design that a faith in a illegitimacy of state mandated ‘informational’ element is adequate to free us, and those who reason a beliefs, from carrying to accept them,” a orator for a classification said in a statement.


About admin